New report: Hong Kong: The Steady Erosion of Freedom

Thanks to the Henry Jackson Society and the many wonderful contributors and friends who contributed to this report — Joe Lian, Martin Lee, Margaret Ng, Alex Chow, Jeffrey Ngo, Ben Rogers, Kerry Brown and Milia Hau.

Thanks also to Fiona Bruce and Catherine West, Richard Ottaway, Malcolm Rifkind and the late Paddy Ashdown, who have all done so much in the UK to keep Hong Kong relevant; and the many others who have all played their part but who must remain anonymous.

In particular I wish to thank John Hemmings, director of the Asia Centre at the HJS, who has been such a positive support and friend during difficult times.

It pains me to have compiled this report, and I wish the view were not so bleak. But one can not really love a people or a place by willingly turning a blind eye.

Continue reading

Thirty years on, the pain of Tiananmen still haunts Chinese families like mine

Thirty years ago on June 4, I sat around a small television screen at my grandmothers home in Hong Kong. I was nine years old. My grandmother sat closest to the television, on a small plastic stool. All of my family in Hong Kong were there in that room, in front of that small screen. I sat cross-legged on the floor, beside my mother, who held me firmly. As we watched I felt her grip tighten. At several points she embraced and kissed me, and I felt her tears on my cheek.

Continue reading

Hong Kong is the crossroads where internal authoritarianism meets external bullying 有關香港前途:英國須了解習總掌權下的中國

Why it was wrong of a Cambridge college to award Carrie Lam an honorary fellowship? 為何劍橋大學授予林鄭月娥名譽院士是錯誤之舉?

Having publicly stated he believes it wrong that a Cambridge college award Carrie Lam an honorary fellowship, Evan explores how he arrived at this conclusion. Ms.Lam may be a good candidate on paper, but the Hong Kong that she has shaped is increasingly authoritarian in nature, and represents the antithesis of what the university should champion.

Continue reading

《金融時報》編輯不獲續簽證 證香港已徹底地被改變 Refused visa for FT editor marks a clear line in the sand

編按:《金融時報》亞洲新聞編輯、香港外國記者會 (FCC) 副主席馬凱 (Victor Mallet) ,被入境署拒絕工作簽證續期申請,外間質疑這是與早前主持民族黨午餐會引起,是打壓新聞自由之舉。 Evan 認為事件已顯示香港已撤底地改變,馬凱為新聞自由而作的行為不單是不被接受,更會被懲罰。

Let there now be no shadow of doubt. Any pretence that Hong Kong has not changed fundamentally, and that the city’s core values, way of life and institutions remain intact and functioning has now to be dropped.

The news that the Hong Kong authorities refused to renew a working visa for Financial Times Asia editor Victor Mallet has deservedly caught the headlines not only in Hong Kong but around the world. Questions will be raised in the UK parliament and statements will be made by the relevant government departments. Academics, journalists and other China-watchers are twittering privately.

Continue reading

香港政治紀錄片《分域大道》誠實有深度 Last Exit to Kai Tak

編按: Evan 在本文之中評論英國導演杜浩綸 (Matthew Torne) 最新紀錄片作品《分域大道》,他認為《分》雖然某些部份節奏太慢,但整體捕捉到 2014 年後的香港民主與身份認同的政治多樣性,是罕見誠實、有深度的政治紀錄片 。

Evan reviews Matthew Torne’s new documentary film, and finds a film that despite being slow at times dares to capture the diverse nature of the politics of democracy and identity in Hong Kong post-2014 with a rare honesty and depth.

*  *  *

Last Exit to Kai Tak, which has its Hong Kong premiere today (26.9) at the Hong Kong Arts Centre, is British filmmaker Matthew Torne’s third documentary film on Hong Kong’s increasingly complex pro-democracy movement. Torne’s new film expands on the narrative of his previous films, Lesson’s in Dissent (2014) and Joshua, Teenager vs. Superpower (2017), which won an audience award at the Sundance Film Festival, in a way that mirrors both the changing circumstances and social and political complexities of Hong Kong as well as the directors own maturity.

Continue reading

Never mind the partisan labels: the real loser of Hong Kong’s by-elections was our political system

The results of this month’s Legislative Council by-election were split evenly between the pro-democracy and pro-establishment camps, with each returning two of the four seats contested.

The results however do represent a loss for the pro-democracy camp, given that the by-election was called following the disqualification of four of pro-democracy legislators. The loss of these two seats is an effective loss, as the pan-democrats will no longer have sufficient seats in the Legislative Council to veto legislation. Indeed, two further seats may be vacated pending upcoming court rulings.

Continue reading