Tag Archives: basic law

基本法的新詮釋?政府該給香港人理由為何羅哲斯被拒入境 A new interpretation of the Basic Law? Hong Kong deserves to know why Rogers was denied entry

編按: Evan 認為,在羅哲斯被拒入境時,根據《基本法》林鄭一定已被知會;如果羅哲斯入境確實是外交問題,構成「外交事務」的要素必須要釐清,並理應告知羅哲斯、英國政府和香港人。

Evan argues that in denying Rogers entry, Carrie Lam must have been informed in accordance with the Basic Law; and if his entry was indeed a foreign affair issue, what constitutes “foreign affairs” needs to be defined. Rogers, the British government and the Hong Kong people should be told.

Continue reading

香港人有感到被中共代表嗎? Do Hong Kong People Feel Represented by the Chinese National Congress?

編按:Evan 指出香港人普遍對十九大的反應遲鈍。他認為所謂的「中國特色社會主義」,是依附著無期望能創出自己未來的人——這些人潛意識地信任權力而非這些演出。他希望我們勇於發問一些同胞不敢問的事。

Evan notes the muted response in Hong Kong to the 19th National Congress. He argues that so-called “socialism with Chinese characteristics” is contingent on a people who have no expectation of shaping their own future — people who subconsciously believe in authority rather than representation. He dares us to ask those questions our countrymen dare not.

Continue reading